Velika Indija

Indijska kulturna sfera
Velika Indija
	Indijski kulturni obseg; temno oranžna: Indijska podcelina (Bangladeš, Butan, Indija, Maldivi, Nepal, Pakistan in Šrilanka); svetlo oranžna: Jugovzhodna Azija kulturno povezana z Indijo, predvsem Brunej, Kambodža, Vzhodni Timor, Indonezija (posebej zahodna Nova Gvineja), Laos, Malezija, Mjanmar (Burma), Singapur, Južni Vietnam (kraljestvo Champa) in Tajska; rumeno: Regije z znatnim indijskim kulturnim vplivom, zlasti Filipini, Tibet, Junan in zgodovinski vzhodni Afghanistan
Juhovzhodna Azija
Indijanizirana kraljestva	Angkor, Borobodur, Butuan, Cebu, kraljestvo Champa, Chenla, Devaraja, Dvaravati, Funan, Tondo,Gangga Negara, Harihara, Kalingga, Kutai, Langkasuka, Majapahit, Pagan, Pan Pan, Singhasari, Srivijaya, Tarumanagara
Budizem	Kambodža, Laos, Malezija, Mjanmar, Filipini, Singapur, Tajska
Hinduizem	Kambodža, Laos, Indonezija, Mjanmar, Tajska
Južna Azija
Budizem	Afghanistan, Bangladeš, Butan, Indija, Nepal, Pakistan, Šrilanka, Tibet
Hinduizem	Bangladeš, Butan, Indija, Nepal, Pakistan, Šrilanka
Vzhodna Azija
Prenos budizma po svilni poti	Kitajska, Japonska, Koreja, Mongolija, Vietnam
Centralna Azija
Budistično meništvo	Centrala Azija, Uzbekistan
Hinduistično meništvo	Rusija
	Indosfera · Hindujska besedila · Budistična besedila · Folklora Indije · Ramajana (Različica Ramajane)
	p; p; u;

Velika Indija ali indijska kulturna sfera je območje, ki ga sestavljajo številne države in regije v južni in jugovzhodni Aziji, na katere je zgodovinsko vplivala indijska kultura, ki je sama nastala iz različnih različnih avtohtonih kultur teh regij. Zlasti vpliv jugovzhodne Azije na zgodnjo Indijo je trajno vplival na oblikovanje hinduizma in indijske mitologije. Sam hinduizem se je oblikoval iz različnih različnih ljudskih religij, ki so se združile v vedskem obdobju in naslednjih obdobjih.^[5] Izraz Velika Indija kot sklicevanje na indijsko kulturno sfero je v dvajsetih letih dvajsetega stoletja popularizirala mreža bengalskih učenjakov. To je krovni izraz, ki zajema indijsko podcelino in okoliške države, ki so kulturno povezane prek raznolike kulturne linije. Te države so bile v različnih stopnjah spremenjene s sprejemanjem in vnašanjem kulturnih in institucionalnih elementov druga od druge. Od okoli leta 500 pred našim štetjem je vse večja kopenska in pomorska trgovina v Aziji povzročila dolgotrajno družbeno-ekonomsko in kulturno spodbujanje ter širjenje hindujskih in budističnih verovanj v kozmologijo regije, zlasti v jugovzhodni Aziji in na Šrilanki.^[6] V Srednji Aziji je bil prenos idej pretežno verske narave. Širjenje islama je bistveno spremenilo potek zgodovine Velike Indije.^[7]

Do zgodnjih stoletij našega štetja je večina kneževin jugovzhodne Azije učinkovito absorbirala odločilne vidike hindujske kulture, vere in uprave. Pojem božanskega kraljestva je bil uveden s konceptom Harihare, sanskrt in drugi indijski epigrafski sistemi so bili razglašeni za uradne, kot so sistemi južnoindijske dinastije Pallava in dinastije Chalukya.^[8] Za ta indijanizirana kraljestva, izraz, ki ga je skoval George Cœdès v svojem delu Histoire ancienne des états hindouisés d'Extrême-Orient,^[9] so bila značilna presenetljiva odpornost, politična integriteta in upravna stabilnost.^[10]

Na severu so bile indijske verske ideje asimilirane v kozmologijo himalajskih ljudstev, najgloblje v Tibetu in Butanu, ter se zlile z domorodnimi tradicijami. Budistično meništvo se je razširilo v Afganistan, Uzbekistan in druge dele Srednje Azije, budistična besedila in ideje pa so zlahka sprejeli na Kitajskem in Japonskem na vzhodu.^[11] Na zahodu se je indijska kultura zbližala z Veliko Perzijo prek Hindukuša in gorovja Pamir.^[12]

Sklici

↑ Mehta, Jaswant Lal (1979). Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (v angleščini). Zv. I (1. izd.). Sterling Publishers. str. 31. OCLC 557595150. Modern Afghanistan was part of ancient India; the Afghans belonged to the pale of Indo-Aryan civilisation. In the eighty century, the country was known by two regional names—Kabul land Zabul. The northern part, called Kabul (or Kabulistan) was governed by a Buddhist dynasty. Its capital and the river on the banks of which it was situated, also bore the same name. Lalliya, a Brahmin minister of the last Buddhist ruler Lagaturman, deposed his master and laid the foundation of the Hindushahi dynasty in c. 865.
↑ Chandra, Satish (2006). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals (v angleščini). Har-Anand Publications. str. 41. ISBN 9788124110669. Although Afghanistan was considered an integral part of India in antiquity, and was often called "Little India" even in medieval times, politically it had not been a part of India after the downfall of the Kushan empire, followed by the defeat of the Hindu Shahis by Mahmud Ghazni.
↑ »Astrakhan's India Connection«. 16. marec 2020.
↑ »Fascinating Accounts of Indians in Russia Dating Back to the 17th Century«.
↑ Lévi, Sylvain; Przyluski, Jean; Bloch, Jules (1993). Pre-Aryan and Pre-Dravidian in India (v angleščini). Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-0772-9.
↑ Kenneth R. Hal (1985). Maritime Trade and State Development in Early Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press. str. 63. ISBN 978-0-8248-0843-3.
↑ Fussman, Gérard (2008–2009). »History of India and Greater India«. La Lettre du Collège de France (4): 24–25. doi:10.4000/lettre-cdf.756. Pridobljeno 20. decembra 2016.
↑ Lavy, Paul (2003), »As in Heaven, So on Earth: The Politics of Visnu Siva and Harihara Images in Preangkorian Khmer Civilisation«, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34 (1): 21–39, doi:10.1017/S002246340300002X, S2CID 154819912, pridobljeno 23. decembra 2015
↑ Coedès (1968), str. ;14–.
↑ Manguin, Pierre-Yves (2002), »From Funan to Sriwijaya: Cultural continuities and discontinuities in the Early Historical maritime states of Southeast Asia«, 25 tahun kerjasama Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi dan Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient, Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi / EFEO, str. 59–82
↑ »Buddhism in China: A Historical Overview« (PDF). The Saylor Foundation 1. Pridobljeno 12. februarja 2017.
↑ Zhu, Qingzhi (Marec 1995). »Some Linguistic Evidence for Early Cultural Exchange between China and India« (PDF). Sino-Platonic Papers. University of Pennsylvania. 66. everyone knows well the so-called "Buddhist conquest of China" or "Indianized China"

Reference

Ali, Jason R.; Aitchison, Jonathan C. (2005), »Greater India«, Earth-Science Reviews, 72 (3–4): 169–188, Bibcode:2005ESRv...72..169A, doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.07.005
Azurara, Gomes Eannes de (1446), Chronica do Discobrimento e Conquista de Guiné (eds. Carreira and Pantarem, 1841), Paris
Bayley, Susan (2004), »Imagining 'Greater India': French and Indian Visions of Colonialism in the Indic Mode«, Modern Asian Studies, 38 (3): 703–744, doi:10.1017/S0026749X04001246, S2CID 145353715
Beazley, Raymond (december 1910), »Prince Henry of Portugal and the Progress of Exploration«, The Geographical Journal, 36 (6): 703–716, doi:10.2307/1776846, JSTOR 1776846{{citation}}: Vzdrževanje CS1: samodejni prevod datuma (povezava)
Caverhill, John (1767), »Some Attempts to Ascertain the Utmost Extent of the Knowledge of the Ancients in the East Indies«, Philosophical Transactions, 57: 155–178, doi:10.1098/rstl.1767.0018, S2CID 186214598
Coedes, George (1967), The Indianized States of Southeast Asia (PDF), Australian National University Press, arhivirano iz prvotnega spletišča (PDF) dne 6. marca 2019
Coedès, George (1968), The Indianized States of South-East Asia, University of Hawaii Press, ISBN 978-0-8248-0368-1
Guha-Thakurta, Tapati (1992), The making of a new 'Indian' art. Artists, aesthetics and nationalism in Bengal, c. 1850–1920, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Handy, E. S. Craighill (1930), »The Renaissance of East Indian Culture: Its Significance for the Pacific and the World«, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, 3 (4): 362–369, doi:10.2307/2750560, JSTOR 2750560
Keenleyside, T. A. (Summer 1982), »Nationalist Indian Attitudes Towards Asia: A Troublesome Legacy for Post-Independence Indian Foreign Policy«, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia, 55 (2): 210–230, doi:10.2307/2757594, JSTOR 2757594
Majumdar, R. C., H. C. Raychaudhuri, and Kalikinkar Datta (1960), An Advanced History of India, London: Macmillan and Co., 1122 pages
Narasimhaiah, C. D. (1986), »The cross-cultural dimensions of English in religion, politics and literature«, World Englishes, 5 (2–3): 221–230, doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.1986.tb00728.x
Thapar, Romila (1968), »Interpretations of Ancient Indian History«, History and Theory, Wesleyan University, 7 (3): 318–335, doi:10.2307/2504471, JSTOR 2504471
Wheatley, Paul (november 1982), »Presidential Address: India Beyond the Ganges—Desultory Reflections on the Origins of Civilisation in Southeast Asia«, The Journal of Asian Studies, Association for Asian Studies, 42 (1): 13–28, doi:10.2307/2055365, JSTOR 2055365, S2CID 161697583{{citation}}: Vzdrževanje CS1: samodejni prevod datuma (povezava)

Zunanje povezave

Rethinking Tibeto-Burman – Lessons from Indosphere
THEORIES OF INDIANISATION Exemplified by Selected Case Studies from Indonesia (Insular Southeast Asia), by Dr. Helmut Lukas

[Lal1979-1] Mehta, Jaswant Lal (1979). Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (v angleščini). Zv. I (1. izd.). Sterling Publishers. str. 31. OCLC 557595150. Modern Afghanistan was part of ancient India; the Afghans belonged to the pale of Indo-Aryan civilisation. In the eighty century, the country was known by two regional names—Kabul land Zabul. The northern part, called Kabul (or Kabulistan) was governed by a Buddhist dynasty. Its capital and the river on the banks of which it was situated, also bore the same name. Lalliya, a Brahmin minister of the last Buddhist ruler Lagaturman, deposed his master and laid the foundation of the Hindushahi dynasty in c. 865.

[Chandra2006-2] Chandra, Satish (2006). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals (v angleščini). Har-Anand Publications. str. 41. ISBN 9788124110669. Although Afghanistan was considered an integral part of India in antiquity, and was often called "Little India" even in medieval times, politically it had not been a part of India after the downfall of the Kushan empire, followed by the defeat of the Hindu Shahis by Mahmud Ghazni.

[3] »Astrakhan's India Connection«. 16. marec 2020.

[4] »Fascinating Accounts of Indians in Russia Dating Back to the 17th Century«.

[5] Lévi, Sylvain; Przyluski, Jean; Bloch, Jules (1993). Pre-Aryan and Pre-Dravidian in India (v angleščini). Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-0772-9.

[Hal1985-6] Kenneth R. Hal (1985). Maritime Trade and State Development in Early Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press. str. 63. ISBN 978-0-8248-0843-3.

[college-7] Fussman, Gérard (2008–2009). »History of India and Greater India«. La Lettre du Collège de France (4): 24–25. doi:10.4000/lettre-cdf.756. Pridobljeno 20. decembra 2016.

[academia_edu-8] Lavy, Paul (2003), »As in Heaven, So on Earth: The Politics of Visnu Siva and Harihara Images in Preangkorian Khmer Civilisation«, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34 (1): 21–39, doi:10.1017/S002246340300002X, S2CID 154819912, pridobljeno 23. decembra 2015

[FOOTNOTECoedès196814–-9] Coedès (1968), str. ;14–.

[10] Manguin, Pierre-Yves (2002), »From Funan to Sriwijaya: Cultural continuities and discontinuities in the Early Historical maritime states of Southeast Asia«, 25 tahun kerjasama Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi dan Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient, Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi / EFEO, str. 59–82

[11] »Buddhism in China: A Historical Overview« (PDF). The Saylor Foundation 1. Pridobljeno 12. februarja 2017.

[12] Zhu, Qingzhi (Marec 1995). »Some Linguistic Evidence for Early Cultural Exchange between China and India« (PDF). Sino-Platonic Papers. University of Pennsylvania. 66. everyone knows well the so-called "Buddhist conquest of China" or "Indianized China"

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]